In short
Act 194-2026 amends Article 4 of Act 205-2004, the Organic Act of the Department of Justice. The Secretary is the legal representative of the Government of Puerto Rico, of its agencies and of the People of Puerto Rico in civil, criminal, administrative and special suits and proceedings in which it is a party. In proceedings before administrative forums, whether before the agency itself or before another agency with power to regulate, investigate or adjudicate, executive-branch agencies shall have the option of requesting the Department of Justice’s services or of being represented by agency-employed attorneys or attorneys contracted for professional services, without having to request any kind of dispensation or permission to that effect. Should they choose that alternative, the agency must notify its decision in writing to the Department of Justice. When an agency is represented by its attorneys contracted for professional services before an administrative proceeding, it must report the case status quarterly to the Assistant Secretariat for Civil Affairs of the Department of Justice. In addition, every settlement, transaction, stipulation or agreement related to the object of the legal action in adjudicative proceedings, made by the administrative body’s representation before the corresponding agency, must have the prior approval of the Department of Justice. Nevertheless, the following cases must be referred to the Department of Justice: cases invested with high public interest; cases carrying important decisions on the establishment of general government public policy; and when it is necessary to seek judicial review of an administrative determination, for which the Secretary of Justice may grant a dispensation.
What is it?
It is a rule about who sits on the other side of the table when you litigate against an agency in an administrative forum. The Act gives executive-branch agencies three options — request an attorney from the Department of Justice, use their own employed attorneys, or contract attorneys for professional services — without having to request a dispensation. That matters to you for two practical reasons: you will know who you are negotiating with, and you will know that attorney cannot close a deal on their own.
Who can do it?
The rule applies to executive-branch agencies and to proceedings before administrative forums, “whether before the agency itself or before another agency with power to regulate, investigate or adjudicate.” For you as a citizen there is no requirement to meet: it is a rule about the government’s legal representation, not a procedure you apply for.
Requirements
Information pending verification.
Documents you need
Information pending verification.
Cost
Step by step
Step 1: The attorney across from you may not be from Justice
The Act opens three routes and puts them in the same sentence: “executive-branch agencies shall have the option of requesting the Department of Justice’s services or of being represented by agency-employed attorneys or attorneys contracted for professional services, without having to request any kind of dispensation or permission to that effect.” Previously a dispensation had to be arranged; now it does not. The only thing the agency must do if it chooses that alternative is notify its decision in writing to the Department of Justice.
Step 2: The point that most matters to you: the deal does not close there
If you are negotiating with the agency’s attorney, this sentence changes your expectations: “every settlement, transaction, stipulation or agreement related to the object of the legal action in adjudicative proceedings, made by the administrative body’s representation before the corresponding agency, must have the prior approval of the Department of Justice.” Four distinct words — settlement, transaction, stipulation, agreement — all fall under the same prior-approval requirement. A handshake does not end the case.
Step 3: If the agency uses contracted attorneys, there is a quarterly report
The Act adds a follow-up duty for one of the three options: “When an agency is represented by its attorneys contracted for professional services before an administrative proceeding, it must report the case status quarterly to the Assistant Secretariat for Civil Affairs of the Department of Justice.” That duty falls on the agency, not on you, and it creates no right of yours to receive that report: the Act does not say so.
Step 4: Three case types still go to Justice
The flexibility has a ceiling and the Act lists it: “the following cases must be referred to the Department of Justice: 1) cases invested with high public interest; 2) cases carrying important decisions on the establishment of general government public policy; and 3) when it is necessary to seek judicial review of an administrative determination, for which the Secretary of Justice may grant a dispensation.” Note the third: if the case goes to judicial review, Justice comes back in, with the possibility of the Secretary granting a dispensation.
Step 5: What did not change: who is the government’s legal representative
The first paragraph of Article 4 is unchanged and worth keeping in mind: “The Secretary is the legal representative of the Government of Puerto Rico, of its agencies and of the People of Puerto Rico in civil, criminal, administrative and special suits and proceedings in which it is a party and that are brought in the courts or other forums in or outside the jurisdiction of Puerto Rico. The Secretary shall exercise this representation personally or through the attorneys, prosecutors and advocates or through the Solicitor General.” The new rule is an option within that framework, not a replacement of it.
Step 6: Municipalities remain mentioned separately
The article closes by listing whom the Secretary is to represent, and subsection (c) of the enacted text reads: “municipalities, when the conditions established by Act 107-2020, as amended, known as the ‘Municipal Code of Puerto Rico’ and this Act are present.” We did not read the Municipal Code, so we publish no list of those conditions.
Step 7: The regulation coming, and its deadline
Section 2 orders: “The Department of Justice is ordered to amend its regulations in accordance with the provisions of this Act, within a term not exceeding ninety (90) days from its approval.” The Act took effect immediately upon approval. We did not read that amended regulation and do not know whether it has been adopted, so we publish no content from it.
Where to do it
There is nothing to apply for: this Act governs the government’s legal representation, not a citizen procedure. Your case proceeds in whichever administrative forum applies. The Department of Justice is the one that receives the agency’s written notice, the quarterly report when there are contracted attorneys, and the request for prior approval of any settlement.
How long it takes
What to do if something goes wrong
What we did not read and therefore do not publish. We did not read the rest of Act 205-2004 beyond the Article 4 this Act reproduces, so we publish no other function of the Department of Justice. We did not read Act 38-2017 on uniform administrative procedure, so we publish no deadlines, notices or hearing procedure. We did not read the regulation Section 2 orders amended, nor do we know whether it has been adopted. We did not read the Municipal Code, so we publish no conditions under which the Secretary represents municipalities. And we publish no criterion for what counts as “high public interest” or “general government public policy”: the Act uses those phrases without defining them. Cost is marked free because this Act imposes no payment on the citizen; time is marked unverified because the only deadline it sets — ninety days — runs for the Justice regulation, not for your case.
Common mistakes
- Treating a deal with the agency’s attorney as closed: every settlement, transaction, stipulation or agreement needs the Department of Justice’s prior approval.
- Assuming the person opposing you is a Justice attorney: it may be an agency-employed attorney or one contracted for professional services.
- Believing the agency needed a dispensation to use its own attorneys: the Act expressly says it no longer does.
- Expecting the agency to give you the quarterly report: that duty runs to Justice’s Assistant Secretariat for Civil Affairs, not to you.
- Thinking Justice is out of the case: it still comes in for high-public-interest cases, general public policy cases, and when judicial review is needed.
- Looking in this Act for your administrative hearing’s procedure: that is in another Act we did not read.
Frequently asked questions
Can the agency’s attorney close a settlement with me?
Not alone. Every settlement, transaction, stipulation or agreement made by the administrative body’s representation in an adjudicative proceeding must have the prior approval of the Department of Justice.
Who represents an agency in an administrative forum?
The agency chooses among three: request the Department of Justice’s services, use agency-employed attorneys, or attorneys contracted for professional services. It needs no dispensation, but must notify its decision in writing to Justice.
In which cases must Justice come in regardless?
In three: cases invested with high public interest; cases carrying important decisions on general government public policy; and when judicial review of an administrative determination is necessary, for which the Secretary may grant a dispensation.
Does this Act change my hearing’s procedure?
Not by its own text. It governs who represents the agency and what approvals that representation needs. It does not touch deadlines, notices or the hearing process, which are in another Act.
Official sources
These are the government pages this guide is based on.
- Departamento de Justicia de Puerto Rico
Justicia
bvirtualogp.pr.gov
Last verified
August 29, 2026
MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.
MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.
Was this guide helpful?
Did you find out-of-date information?
Expert drafts: what the other side can no longer request
Act 172-2026 gives work-product protection to expert report drafts and attorney-expert communications. Three exceptions remain that the court may still order.
Civil Lawsuit Registry: what the government has been sued for and what it paid
Act 1-2003 created at Justice a public registry of government civil lawsuits over $5,000, with the amount claimed and the amount awarded or agreed.
How Puerto Rico’s court system is organized, and who is who in the courtroom
The three levels and what each is for, why you do not testify at the Court of Appeals, and what each official you will meet does.
Asking the court to disqualify a lawyer
Rule 9.3 now lists the five criteria the court must weigh, and requires hearing the lawyer before ruling.