Skip to content
MiPRFácil
ESEN
Work & Unemployment

Recovering litigation costs when a worker wins their claim

Last reviewed: August 26, 2026VerifiedDepartamento del Trabajo

In short

Act 185 of 2026 amends Section 15 of Act 2 of 1961, the "Summary Procedure for Labor Claims Act," so that a judgment in favor of the worker who files the claim awards recovery of litigation costs only to that claiming party, following the procedure in Rule 44.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The law responds directly to Class Fernández v. Metro Health Care Management System (2024 TSPR 63), where the Puerto Rico Supreme Court held the prior text did not allow that recovery. The amendment also reaffirms that no case filed under the summary procedure cancels Internal Revenue or Bar Association stamps.

External link

Go to the official site

You'll leave MiPRFácilOpens in a new tab

bvirtualogp.pr.gov

What is it?

It is a new right within the summary labor claims procedure: if you file a claim against your employer under Act 2-1961 and the court rules in your favor, the judgment must also award recovery of litigation costs — the expenses of the judicial process, not your attorney's fees — in your favor, following Rule 44.1's procedure.

Who can do it?

It reaches the worker who files a labor claim under Act 2-1961's summary procedure and obtains judgment in their favor. The right to recover costs is "solely in favor of that claiming party" — meaning the prevailing worker, not the employer.

Requirements

Documents you need

Information pending verification.

Cost

This procedure has no cost.

Step by step

  1. Step 1: A judgment in your favor now includes costs

    The new text of Section 15 says: "A judgment rendered in favor of the claiming party shall award recovery of litigation costs solely in favor of that claiming party." You do not need to request it as a separate benefit; it is part of what the judgment must award.

  2. Step 2: The request follows Rule 44.1's procedure

    The law expressly points to "the procedure established in Rule 44.1 of the Puerto Rico Rules of Civil Procedure" to request and grant those costs. We did not read that Rule for this guide, so we do not describe its deadlines or exact mechanics.

  3. Step 3: Distinguish costs from attorney's fees

    The law treats these two concepts separately within the same paragraph. Litigation costs are the process expenses; attorney's fees are a different thing. The amended text's second sentence says that when the claiming party prevails and appeared represented by private counsel, "the defendant shall be awarded payment of attorney's fees" — literally, as written in the official text the Legislature filed. We flag this because that sentence's language appears to run counter to the purpose the exposición de motivos explains, and we found no later version correcting it.

  4. Step 4: No stamps are cancelled in these cases

    Section 15's first sentence keeps what the Supreme Court had already settled: "Every case filed under this Section shall be exempt from the required cancellation of stamps," for both the worker and the employer.

Where to do it

This is not a separate procedure requested at an office: it is part of the judgment within the summary labor claim lawsuit you already filed in court, under Act 2-1961. The specific request for costs follows Rule 44.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure within that same case.

How long it takes

Check the current processing time with the official agency.

What to do if something goes wrong

What we do not publish, and why. We did not read Rule 44.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, so we do not describe its filing deadline or exact mechanics — only that it is the procedure this law points to. We also did not read the law's exact signature date in our copy — the Governor's stamp came out illegible in the OCR — so we cite only the Senate's certification date (June 30, 2026). A reading caution, not a legal opinion: the official text we read awards, in its second sentence, attorney's fees to the defendant (employer) when the claimant prevails represented by private counsel — which appears reversed from the purpose the exposición de motivos describes, which is protecting the worker. We publish the text as written, without resolving it, and recommend checking with a labor attorney before calculating what can be recovered.

Common mistakes

  • Confusing cost recovery with attorney's fees: the law treats them separately.
  • Thinking a separate procedure must be filed: cost recovery is part of the judgment in the same case.
  • Not verifying Rule 44.1's deadlines with your attorney before requesting costs.
  • Assuming the employer can never receive fees in these cases: the official text's second sentence says the opposite when the claimant prevails with private counsel.

Frequently asked questions

What are "litigation costs" under this law?

They are the expenses of the judicial process, separate from attorney's fees. The law grants their recovery solely to the worker who files the claim and wins.

Do I have to request costs separately?

Requesting and granting costs follows Rule 44.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure within the same case; we did not read that Rule for this guide, so confirm the details with your attorney.

Why was this law passed?

It responds to Class Fernández v. Metro Health Care Management System (2024 TSPR 63), where the Supreme Court held the prior text of Section 15 did not allow the prevailing worker to recover costs.

Official sources

These are the government pages this guide is based on.

Last verified

August 26, 2026

MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.

MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.

Was this guide helpful?

Did you find out-of-date information?

Did you find out-of-date information?

No account needed. We don't ask for personal data.