In short
Sometimes dividing an inheritance right away is not in anyone’s interest: there is a business running, land not worth splitting, or simply a need for time. The Code allows it and Article 1606 says where that indivisión may come from: by the will of the testator, by agreement among the heirs, or by disposition of law. The third case is named and not developed; the Code does not say here in what cases the law imposes it and this guide does not supply that. The first two do have rules, and they are not the same though they share the same number. Article 1607 gives the testator a hard limit: they may impose on the heirs the indivisión of the inheritance for a term not greater than four years. And it adds an important carve-out: this indivisión does not reach the goods that constitute the legítima. It also leaves a valve: the court may authorise the total or partial division before the term expires, at the request of a co-heir, if grave circumstances or reasons of manifest utility concur. Article 1608 deals with the agreement among heirs and there the four works differently: they may agree the indivisión for a term not exceeding four years, which may be extended by new agreements not exceeding four years each. That is, the testator gets four years and that is that; the heirs get four years renewable in four-year blocks. It is also worth noting what 1608 does not repeat: it does not mention the legítima carve-out that 1607 carries, and this guide does not add it. Article 1609 closes with a rescue rule: any term imposed by the testator or agreed by the co-heirs that is greater than the maximum permitted is understood reduced to the legal term. An over-long clause does not fall: it is trimmed.
What is it?
They are Articles 1606 to 1609 of the Civil Code of 2020: where an inheritance’s indivisión may come from, the four-year caps for the testator and for the heirs’ agreement, and what happens with an excessive term.
Who can do it?
Whoever inherits with others and runs into a ban on dividing, and whoever wants to agree with their co-heirs to keep the goods together for a time.
Requirements
- The indivisión may be established by the testator’s will, by agreement among the heirs or by disposition of law.Verified against the official source
- The testator may impose it for a term not greater than four years, and that indivisión does not reach the goods constituting the legítima.Verified against the official source
- The heirs may agree it for a term not exceeding four years, extendable by new agreements not exceeding four years each.Verified against the official source
- Any term greater than the maximum permitted is understood reduced to the legal term.Verified against the official source
Documents you need
Cost
Step by step
Step 1: Three possible sources
Article 1606: by the testator’s will, by agreement among the heirs, or by disposition of law.
Step 2: The third is left undeveloped
The Code does not say here which law imposes the indivisión or in what cases. This guide names the item and does not fill it in.
Step 3: The testator: four years
Article 1607: they may impose the indivisión for a term not greater than four years. It is a cap, not a fixed term.
Step 4: But the legítima is carved out
The same article: this indivisión does not reach the goods that constitute the legítima. The Code does not define the legítima here; it is in the following Title.
Step 5: And the court may cut it short
Second paragraph of 1607: it may authorise the total or partial division before the term expires, at the request of a co-heir.
Step 6: On what ground
If grave circumstances or reasons of manifest utility concur. The Code defines neither expression and neither does this guide.
Step 7: The heirs’ agreement: four years too
Article 1608: they may agree the indivisión for a term not exceeding four years.
Step 8: But this one renews
The same article: it may be extended by new agreements not exceeding four years each. That is the difference from the testator.
Step 9: What 1608 does not repeat
It does not mention the legítima carve-out that 1607 carries. This guide reports that silence instead of carrying the carve-out into the pact.
Step 10: If the term runs over
Article 1609: any term greater than the maximum permitted is understood reduced to the legal term. The clause is not voided, it is trimmed.
Where to do it
The only article in this group that leads to a forum is 1607, when a co-heir asks the court to divide before the term expires. The Code does not say before which court it is requested, in what form or at what fee, and this guide does not assume it. The agreement of Article 1608 is among heirs and the Code requires no form here.
How long it takes
What to do if something goes wrong
If the will obliges you not to divide, check two things before resigning yourself. First: the term may not exceed four years, and if it does, Article 1609 says it is understood reduced to the legal term — the clause does not fall, it is trimmed. Second: Article 1607 says that indivisión does not reach the goods that constitute the legítima. And if even within the term the situation becomes untenable, the same article lets the court authorise the total or partial division at a co-heir’s request, if grave circumstances or reasons of manifest utility concur. If what you have is an agreement among yourselves, Article 1608 admits it up to four years and allows extending it by new agreements of up to four years each; note that article does not repeat the legítima carve-out. These articles do not say in what cases the law imposes indivisión, do not define the legítima or grave circumstances, and do not say from when the four years run. MiPRFácil does not represent anyone in court and gives no legal advice.
Common mistakes
- Believing the testator may forbid dividing indefinitely: the cap in Article 1607 is four years.
- Thinking a clause with an excessive term is void: Article 1609 reduces it to the legal term.
- Assuming the testator’s indivisión affects the legítima: Article 1607 leaves it out.
- Treating the term as closed: the court may authorise the division earlier, for grave circumstances or manifest utility.
- Confusing the testator’s regime with the agreement’s: only the Article 1608 agreement renews.
- Believing the agreement may last more than four years at once: it renews in four-year blocks.
- Carrying the legítima carve-out into the agreement: Article 1608 does not mention it.
- Looking in Article 1606 for the cases in which the law imposes indivisión: it only names the case.
Frequently asked questions
How long can the will stop us from dividing?
Article 1607 says the testator may impose the indivisión for a term not greater than four years.
And if the will says ten years?
Article 1609 says any term greater than the maximum permitted is understood reduced to the legal term.
May the heirs agree not to divide?
Article 1608 says they may agree the indivisión for a term not exceeding four years, extendable by new agreements not exceeding four years each.
May we divide before the term expires?
Article 1607 says the court may authorise the total or partial division before the term expires, at a co-heir’s request, if grave circumstances or reasons of manifest utility concur.
Official sources
These are the government pages this guide is based on.
- Poder Judicial de Puerto Rico
Poder Judicial
bvirtualogp.pr.gov
Last verified
September 11, 2026
MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.
MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.
Was this guide helpful?
Did you find out-of-date information?
Income from inherited goods belongs to the estate until there is a partition
Article 1603 of the Civil Code of 2020 says so, and 1600 adds that the hereditary community has no juridical personality.
You sell your quota without permission; a specific good needs every heir
Article 1604 of the Civil Code of 2020 separates the two, and 1605 gives co-heirs thirty days of tanteo if the buyer is a stranger.
How to make a will in Puerto Rico
The 2020 Civil Code’s kinds of will, who may execute one, and the rule that changed: with forced heirs you may freely dispose of half.
Co-owned property: how it is managed and how it is divided
A co-owner is not required to remain in the community: they may demand division at any time. And management is decided by quota value, not by headcount.
An inheritance can be debts alone: the Code says so in those words
Article 1552 says the inheritance comprises rights and obligations even where obligations exceed rights, or where there are only obligations.
Declaration of heirs: what it is and the two routes to request it
When someone dies without a will, the declaration establishes who inherits. Since Act 282-1999 it can be processed before a notary or the court: you choose.