In short
Act 66 of June 4, 1953 provides that no person who participates in a telephone communication, nor any person outside it, shall record any telephone communication by any mechanical procedure, nor allow that communication to be heard by any person, by means of a telephone extension or by any other means, except with the express consent of all parties taking part in that telephone communication. The same law prohibits intercepting or attempting to intercept, in any way, any telephone communication transmitted or received between places within Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction, in order to learn its content or to allow another person to learn it. It also prohibits anyone who has received an intercepted communication, knowing it was so obtained, from disclosing or publishing its existence, content, substance, purpose, effect or scope; and anyone who discloses without knowing is obligated to report the source of their knowledge, and if they refuse commits the same offense. Courts shall not admit any evidence obtained in violation of those articles. The violation is a misdemeanor, with a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) and, in addition to the fine, imprisonment for a term not exceeding five (5) years.
What is it?
It is the law that answers whether you can record a call you are part of. The answer its text gives is stricter than the “one party’s consent is enough” rule many people have heard: here the express consent of all parties is required, and the article names first, precisely, the person taking part in the call.
Who can do it?
The prohibition reaches any person: both someone taking part in the telephone communication and any person outside it. The protection reaches every telephone communication transmitted or received between places within Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction.
Requirements
- That it be a telephone communication transmitted or received between places within Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction.Verified against the official source
- For the recording or listening to be lawful under this article: express consent of all parties taking part in the telephone communication.Verified against the official source
Documents you need
Information pending verification.
Cost
Step by step
Step 1: Being on the call does not authorize you to record it
The article begins precisely there: “No person who participates in a telephone communication nor any person outside it shall record any telephone communication by any mechanical procedure.” The participant is named first, not excepted.
Step 2: Letting someone listen is covered too
The same sentence continues: “nor allow that communication to be heard by any person, by means of a telephone extension, or by any other means.” In 1953 the example was the extension; “any other means” is the broad language the law used, and it is the part people skip when they put a call on speaker.
Step 3: The consent must be express and from everyone
There is a single exception and it is strictly drawn: “except with the express consent of all parties taking part in that telephone communication.” Express, not implied; of all parties, not one.
Step 4: Intercepting is a separate offense
The first article covers something different from recording: no person shall intercept or attempt to intercept, in any way, any telephone communication transmitted or received between any places within Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction, in order to learn its content or to allow any other person to learn that content. The attempt is expressly included.
Step 5: Disclosing what was intercepted is also prohibited
Anyone who has received an intercepted telephone communication, or has learned its content, substance, purpose, effect or scope, knowing that information was so obtained, may not disclose or publish its existence, content, substance, purpose, effect or scope, or any information contained in it. And there is a rule for someone who discloses without knowing: they are obligated to report the source of their knowledge, and if they refuse, they commit the same offense and the same penalty.
Step 6: That evidence does not enter the court
The law carries its own exclusionary rule: courts shall not admit any evidence obtained in violation of Articles 1, 2 and 3 of this law. That is important for anyone planning to record “to have proof.”
Step 7: The penalty
Every person who violates Articles 1, 2 or 3 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) and, in addition to the fine imposed, may be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding five (5) years.
Where to do it
It is a criminal matter: the complaint is filed with the Puerto Rico Police, a route we cover step by step in its own guide. If the problem is stalking or persistent calls from an individual, that is the stalking guide; if they are telemarketing or fraud calls, those have their own guide; and if what happened was a company leaking your data, that is the data breach guide.
How long it takes
What to do if something goes wrong
Where what we can assert stops. This law is from 1953 and its text speaks of a “telephone communication,” of the telephone extension and of “any other means”; it does not name messaging apps, video calls or cloud recording, and we are not going to extend it ourselves to situations its text does not name. Nor does the law regulate judicially authorized interception: we did not read Puerto Rico’s constitutional provision on the matter, or the federal wiretap statute, or any case law, so we describe no court orders, no exceptions for authorities, and not how courts today apply the Article 4 exclusionary rule. And we read no rule on call-center recording notices or on the recorded notice sometimes heard when calling a company. If your case is specific and the stakes are serious, this is a matter for legal advice, not a guide.
Common mistakes
- Believing your own consent as a party suffices: the law requires the express consent of all parties.
- Thinking only recording is banned: also allowing another person to hear the communication.
- Treating consent as implied: the law says “express.”
- Recording to have proof: courts shall not admit evidence obtained in violation of this law.
- Disclosing the content of something you know was intercepted.
- Underestimating the penalty: beyond the fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment of up to five years.
Frequently asked questions
Can I record a call I am part of?
The article says that no person who participates in a telephone communication, nor any person outside it, shall record any telephone communication by any mechanical procedure, except with the express consent of all parties taking part in that communication.
What if I just put it on speaker so someone else can hear?
The same prohibition covers not allowing “that communication to be heard by any person, by means of a telephone extension, or by any other means,” except with the express consent of all parties.
Is such a recording useful as evidence in court?
The law provides that courts shall not admit any evidence obtained in violation of its Articles 1, 2 and 3.
What is the penalty for violating it?
A misdemeanor, with a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) and, in addition to the fine, imprisonment for a term not exceeding five (5) years.
Official sources
These are the government pages this guide is based on.
- Policía de Puerto Rico
Policía de PR
bvirtualogp.pr.gov
- Puerto Rico Police
Policía de Puerto Rico
policia.pr.gov
Last verified
August 24, 2026
MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.
MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.
Was this guide helpful?
Did you find out-of-date information?
How to file an administrative complaint against a police officer
The five official filing channels, the toll-free SARP number, and why you can file even without the officer’s name or badge number.
Stalking in Puerto Rico: what counts, and how to request a protection order
Ley 284-1999, the two-or-more-occasions pattern, who can request the order — the employer included — and the measures the court can impose.
Telemarketing: the hours, the consent and the free trial
They may not call a residence outside 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., nor call or message you without prior consent. And your silence is not a yes.
Your data was breached: what they must tell you, and how fast
The entity has a non-extendable 10 days to inform DACO, and DACO 24 hours to announce it. You must be notified as expeditiously as possible.
Your image used without consent: Act 139-2011 and its $750 to $100,000 damages
If they use your name, photo, voice or an AI-made version of you to sell without permission, you can stop it and claim damages. You have 1 year.
Personal data when you buy: they cannot require it to complete the sale
Act 38-2016 bars requiring your phone, address, licence or SSN to complete a purchase, whatever the payment method.