Skip to content
MiPRFácil
ESEN
Family

Divorced but not liquidated: the post-ganancial community

Last reviewed: September 7, 2026VerifiedPoder Judicial

In short

Years can pass between the dissolution of the sociedad de gananciales and its final liquidation, and in that time the property is not left in limbo. Once the society is dissolved, there arises between the spouses or ex-spouses a community of property and rights over the whole of the elements of the common patrimony that remain undivided. The baseline rule is equality: it is presumed that while it is not liquidated, each one has and keeps the same equal share over the undivided patrimony existing at the moment of dissolution, as well as over the fruits, the products and the increase or decrease in value. That presumption may be rebutted with evidence that the fruits, products and increase in value are due to the unequal or exclusive effort of one of them or to the investment of privative funds, and also as to every obligation or deterioration caused by the individual, wilful or negligent action of one of them. Nobody is obliged to make the common patrimony produce, but whoever decides to do so on their own answers for the diminution it suffers during the management. And if one buys something for themselves with common money, what is bought is theirs, but the other may demand a credit in favour of the community for the updated amount of the funds used, effective on liquidation.

External link

Go to the official site

You'll leave MiPRFácilOpens in a new tab

bvirtualogp.pr.gov

What is it?

It is Chapter VI of Title V of Book Two of the Civil Code of 2020, Articles 547 to 554. It governs the limbo: the period between the dissolution of the sociedad de gananciales — by divorce, by death, by judgment — and the day the property is actually divided. In Puerto Rico that limbo often lasts longer than the marriage that created it.

Who can do it?

It applies to spouses or ex-spouses whose sociedad de gananciales has been dissolved and whose common patrimony remains undivided, unliquidated.

Requirements

  • That the sociedad de gananciales be dissolved and the common patrimony remain undivided.Verified against the official source
  • To rebut the presumption of equality: evidence that the civil and industrial fruits, the products and the increase in value received are due to the unequal or exclusive effort of one or to the investment of privative funds.Verified against the official source
  • To demand the credit: that one of the co-owners acquired property for themselves at the cost of common property, fruits or products.Verified against the official source
  • For the sale of a share to a third party to extinguish the regime: that the remaining co-owner appear at the agreement to consent to the division and accept that the sale constitutes the final liquidation.Verified against the official source

Documents you need

Cost

Check the current cost with the official agency.

Step by step

  1. Step 1: What is born when the society dissolves

    Once the sociedad de gananciales is dissolved, there arises between the spouses or ex-spouses, as the case may be, a community of property and rights over the whole of the elements of the common patrimony that remain undivided. It is neither the continued sociedad de gananciales nor yet the division: it is a figure of its own, with its own rules, lasting until the final liquidation.

  2. Step 2: Half and half, until proven otherwise

    It is presumed that while the ganancial regime is not liquidated, each spouse or ex-spouse has and keeps the same equal share over the undivided patrimony existing at the moment of the society’s dissolution, as well as over the fruits and products and the increase or decrease in value it receives. If the house rose in price in those years, that gain belongs to both by default; if it fell, so does the loss.

  3. Step 3: How that equality is rebutted

    The presumption yields to evidence that the civil and industrial fruits, the products and the increase in value received are due to the unequal or exclusive effort of one of them, or to the investment of privative funds. And it is also rebuttable as to every obligation, decrease in value or deterioration caused by the individual, wilful or negligent action of one of the spouses or ex-spouses over the common patrimony. It works both ways: whoever put in more may claim it, and whoever caused harm may have to answer for it.

  4. Step 4: You need not make it produce, but if you do, you answer

    The spouse or ex-spouse co-owner is not obliged to develop the common patrimony so that it produces fruits or products beyond what it could naturally or necessarily generate. However, if they choose to do so exclusively or without the other co-owner’s concurrence or consent, they answer for the diminution it suffers during the management. That liability is charged to their share, unless they offer another suitable means of compensation.

  5. Step 5: If you buy something with the common money

    If one of the co-owners acquires other property for themselves at the cost of common property, fruits or products, the new acquisition will belong to them exclusively, but the other co-owner may demand a credit in favour of the community for the updated amount of the common funds used. That credit becomes effective at the moment of the liquidation of the regime giving rise to the community. Two details matter: what is bought belongs to the buyer, and the credit is for the updated amount, not the nominal figure of the time.

  6. Step 6: When it ends, and why selling is not enough

    The post-ganancial community is extinguished when the dissolved sociedad de gananciales that gave rise to it is finally liquidated. And here is a frequent trap: the sale of the entire share of either spouse or ex-spouse to a third party does not extinguish the society, unless the one who remains as co-owner appears at the agreement for the purpose of consenting to the division and accepting that the sale constitutes the final liquidation of that matrimonial regime. Selling your half does not close the matter by itself.

  7. Step 7: The tanteo, and which rules fill the gaps

    The spouses or ex-spouses have the same right of tanteo over the common property as is recognized to co-heirs. The Code puts it that way, borrowing the right without restating its terms, and so we publish neither periods nor procedure for that tanteo here: this chapter does not state them. For the rest: the administration and disposal of the post-ganancial community’s property are governed by the Code’s articles regulating the community of property, and the division and liquidation are governed supplementarily by the provisions on the liquidation and partition of an inheritance.

Where to do it

Disputes over the post-ganancial community and its liquidation are heard in the Court of First Instance. The credit for the use of common funds becomes effective on liquidating the regime.

How long it takes

Check the current processing time with the official agency.

What to do if something goes wrong

If your ex improved or developed a common asset on their own and the result was worse, they answer for the diminution against their share. If they used common money to buy something for themselves, what they bought is theirs but the community has a credit for the updated amount. And if someone tells you it is all over because they sold their half, check whether you appeared to consent to the division: without that, the regime is still alive.

Common mistakes

  • Believing that after the divorce the property is already divided: the post-ganancial community lasts until the final liquidation.
  • Giving up the increase in value of the years after the divorce, when it is presumed equal.
  • Developing a common asset without the other’s consent and not reckoning on answering for the diminution.
  • Claiming the credit for common funds at nominal value instead of the updated amount.
  • Thinking that selling one’s own share to a third party liquidates the regime without the other co-owner appearing.

Frequently asked questions

Whose are the rents until we liquidate?

By presumption, of both in equal parts: the presumption of equality covers the undivided patrimony, the fruits, the products and the increase or decrease in value. It may be rebutted with evidence of unequal or exclusive effort or of the investment of privative funds.

May I sell my half to a third party?

The sale of the entire share to a third party does not by itself extinguish the regime. It only does so if the remaining co-owner appears at the agreement to consent to the division and accept that the sale constitutes the final liquidation. Besides, both hold the right of tanteo recognized to co-heirs.

Must I manage the common property?

You are not obliged to develop the common patrimony so it produces more than it could naturally or necessarily generate. But if you decide to do so exclusively or without the other’s consent, you answer for the diminution it suffers during your management.

How does it differ from ordinary co-ownership?

It is a figure of its own arising from the dissolution of the sociedad de gananciales, with its presumption of equality and its credit for common funds. But the administration and disposal of its property are governed by the community-of-property articles, and its division and liquidation by the rules on the partition of an inheritance.

Official sources

These are the government pages this guide is based on.

Last verified

September 7, 2026

MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.

MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.

Was this guide helpful?

Did you find out-of-date information?

Did you find out-of-date information?

No account needed. We don't ask for personal data.