In short
Act 26-1934 punishes as a misdemeanor any person who, with the purpose of defrauding another, makes, draws, endorses or delivers a check, draft, bill or money order knowing they lack sufficient funds or credit at the bank to pay it on presentment. The bank refusing payment for insufficient funds is prima facie evidence that the drawer or endorser knew of the insufficiency. But the law itself sets a condition that decides the whole case: no person shall be punished unless it is proven that the holder of the check, or their agent, personally notified the drawer and the endorser to pay, at the address stated in the notice, within a term of not less than ten (10) days if they reside in the holder’s locality, and not less than fifteen (15) days if they reside in another municipality. Payment within those terms releases the person from criminal liability; non-payment after the notice is considered prima facie intent to defraud.
What is it?
It is the law that criminalizes issuing or delivering checks, drafts or bills without sufficient funds in Puerto Rico, in force since 1934 and codified at 33 L.P.R.A. §§ 1851-1856. It covers whoever makes, draws, endorses or delivers the instrument against any bank or other depositary, knowing when doing so that the issuer or drawer lacks sufficient funds or established credit for full payment on presentment. The word "credit" is interpreted as an arrangement or understanding with the drawee bank or depositary for the payment of the check, draft, bill or order.
Who can do it?
Anyone who was paid with a check, draft, bill or money order whose payment the bank refused for insufficient funds or lack of credit. The law protects the holder of the instrument: the person who received it and presented it for payment. It also reaches the endorser, not only the original drawer, both in liability and in the notice that must be given.
Requirements
- That the bank or depositary refused payment of the check, draft or order for insufficient funds or lack of credit.Verified against the official source
- Having personally notified the drawer and the endorser to pay, stating the address where to pay, with a term of not less than 10 days (same locality) or 15 days (another municipality).Verified against the official source
- That the term given in the notice expired without payment: payment within the term releases from criminal liability.Verified against the official source
Documents you need
Cost
Step by step
Step 1: Keep the returned check as is
The dishonored instrument is your best evidence, because Section 2 says the drawee refusing payment for insufficient funds or lack of credit constitutes prima facie evidence of the drawer’s or endorser’s knowledge of that insufficiency. Do not alter it or give it back: keep it together with any bank record of the return.
Step 2: Personally notify the one who drew and the one who endorsed
This is the step the law turns into a requirement: no one shall be punished unless it is proven, to the court’s satisfaction, that the holder of the check or their agent personally notified the drawer and the endorser to pay the holder or their agent, at the address to be stated in the notice. The notice must say where to pay. And note the law says drawer AND endorser: if the check came endorsed by someone else, the notice goes to both.
Step 3: Give the correct term based on where they live
The notice term may not be less than ten (10) days if the drawer or endorser addressed resides in the holder’s locality, nor less than fifteen (15) days if they reside in another municipality. The term runs from the date of the notice. A notice with a shorter term than the legal one does not meet the condition the law itself imposes before anyone can be punished.
Step 4: Wait out the full term before going to court
The law builds two opposite consequences around the term. If they pay within it, Section 6 releases whoever issued or endorsed the check from criminal liability: you got paid and the criminal matter ends there. If they do not pay after the notice, Section 5 says that non-payment shall be considered prima facie intent to defraud, which is precisely the element of the offense.
Step 5: If they did not pay, take the case with your proof of notice
Once the term expires without payment, the offense Section 1 describes is a misdemeanor, and the penalty the text sets is a fine of no less than double the amount of the check, or one day of jail for each dollar or fraction left unpaid, or both at the court’s discretion. Remember the court will demand proof of the notice: without it, the law itself says no person shall be punished.
Where to do it
The criminal case is heard at the Court of First Instance; the complaint is channeled like any offense, starting with a report to the Police or the prosecution. If what you want is to collect the money more than to punish, remember the civil route exists separately: for amounts up to $15,000 there is the Rule 60 proceeding, which we explain in its own guide.
How long it takes
The law sets the notice term as a minimum: not less than 10 days if the drawer or endorser resides in the holder’s locality, and not less than 15 days if they reside in another municipality. It runs from the date of the notice.
Verified against the official source · August 24, 2026
What to do if something goes wrong
The element of the offense is the intent to defraud, and the law itself manages the proof: the check’s return for lack of funds is prima facie evidence of knowledge, and non-payment after the notice is prima facie evidence of intent to defraud. Prima facie means it admits proof to the contrary: the accused can rebut it. What this guide does not cover: Act 26-1934 is from 1934 and its penalty is written in that era’s terms ("one day of jail per dollar"); we did not read the current Penal Code or case law on how courts apply that penalty today, so we quote the text and nothing more. We also did not read the rules of criminal procedure for this guide: the complaint path is described in general terms and detailed in our criminal procedure and police complaint guides.
Common mistakes
- Going straight to press charges without giving the notice: the law says no person shall be punished without proof of the prior notice.
- Giving a shorter term than the legal one: 10 days minimum in the same locality, 15 if the drawer resides in another municipality.
- Notifying only the person who signed the check and forgetting the endorser, when the law requires notifying both.
- Not stating in the notice the address where payment must be made, which is part of the content the law describes.
- Being unable to prove the date of the notice: the term runs from that date and the court demands proof to its satisfaction.
- Returning the original check to the person who drew it: it is your prima facie evidence.
- Believing the case continues even if they pay late: payment within the notice term releases from criminal liability.
- Confusing the criminal route with collection: if what you want is the money, the civil claim (Rule 60 up to $15,000) runs on its own track.
Frequently asked questions
Is paying with a bounced check a crime?
Yes, when done with the purpose of defrauding and knowing there are no sufficient funds or credit at the bank to pay it on presentment. It is a misdemeanor under Act 26-1934, and it covers making, drawing, endorsing or delivering the check, draft, bill or order.
What must I do before I can press charges?
Personally notify the drawer and the endorser to pay you, stating the address where to pay, and give them a term of not less than 10 days if they reside in your locality or 15 days if they reside in another municipality. Without proof of that notice, the law says no person shall be punished.
What happens if they pay me within the term?
Payment of the check, bill, draft or order within the stated terms releases the person who issued or endorsed it from criminal liability. You got paid, and the criminal case does not proceed.
And if they do not pay after the notice?
Non-payment after the notice is considered prima facie intent to defraud, which is the element of the offense. The penalty the text sets is a fine of no less than double the check’s amount, or one day of jail per dollar or fraction unpaid, or both, at the court’s discretion.
Does this get my money back?
The criminal route punishes; collection is a separate civil claim. In practice the notice under Act 26-1934 itself often produces payment, because paying within the term extinguishes criminal liability. If they do not pay, for amounts up to $15,000 there is the summary Rule 60 proceeding.
Official sources
These are the government pages this guide is based on.
- Poder Judicial de Puerto Rico
Poder Judicial
bvirtualogp.pr.gov
Last verified
August 24, 2026
MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.
MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.
Was this guide helpful?
Did you find out-of-date information?
How to claim money owed to you: Rule 60
The summary procedure for debts of $15,000 or less: $60 in stamps, form OAT 991 and a hearing within three months.
Prescription: how long they can collect from you or sue you
Personal actions prescribe in 4 years and damages in 1 year from learning who caused them. Acknowledging the debt restarts the clock.
Debt collection agencies: the 15 practices the law forbids them
Act 143-1968 licenses collection agencies and forbids fifteen practices, from threatening violence to charging additional fees never agreed to.
Charged with a crime in Puerto Rico: the stages of the process and the rights that protect you
What happens after an arrest, the felony and misdemeanour stages, appointed counsel, and the six-month cap on preventive detention.
How to file an administrative complaint against a police officer
The five official filing channels, the toll-free SARP number, and why you can file even without the officer’s name or badge number.
Going to court without a lawyer in Puerto Rico: what self-representation requires, and what you will not be given
The four requirements, when to request it, why permission can be suspended, and the Pro Se Centers that guide you free of charge.