In short
When a complaint succeeds, the fine is not pulled from thin air: the regulation fixes how it is calculated. First the base, which is five hundred dollars or the permit’s cost multiplied by two, whichever is greater — and if there is no permit, five hundred. Then it is multiplied by severity: twice the base for absence of a permit, once for an expired permit, one and a half for breaching conditions, twice for operating a use other than the one authorised, one and a half for false information and three for breaching Board orders. Aggravating factors add twenty per cent, and where the damage is greater and irreparable, fifty per cent or up to fifty thousand dollars. The ceiling is fifty thousand dollars per infraction, with the warning that each day the infraction subsists counts as an independent violation. And two things that change anyone’s calculation: the fines are a real lien on the property’s title, and no reconsideration is entertained without depositing the full amount.
What is it?
It is Chapter 11.4 of Joint Regulation No. 9473. It is what comes after Chapter 11.2: if investigating a complaint concludes the allegations are true, the Planning Board, the autonomous municipality with hierarchy I to III or the government entity concerned issues an administrative fine. The chapter says who issues it, how it is calculated, what the ticket must say, how it is paid and what must be done before asking for it to be reconsidered.
Who can do it?
It applies to anyone fined by the Planning Board, the Permit Audit Officer, a government entity concerned or an autonomous municipality with hierarchy I to III. The regulation adds a group that surprises people: the fines also apply to anyone who obstructs, limits, halts or invades, without authority of law, an authorised construction activity or use. And a fixed ten-thousand-dollar fine falls on any person, entity, agency, instrumentality or municipality authorised to issue permits that grants a provisional permit in violation of Ley 161-2009.
Requirements
- That the ticket or order contain the date and time of issue, the name of the official issuing it, the place of the infraction, the administrative fault charged, the legal provision breached, the amount of the fine and the official’s signature.Verified against the official source
- That the copy delivered also include the instructions for seeking reconsideration and review.Verified against the official source
- Depositing the full amount of the fine with the Planning Board, in the account specially set up for such deposits, before a reconsideration is entertained.Verified against the official source
Documents you need
Information pending verification.
Cost
Step by step
Step 1: Where the fine comes from
If investigating a complaint concludes the allegations are true, the Planning Board, the autonomous municipality with hierarchy I to III or the government entity concerned will issue an administrative fine not exceeding fifty thousand dollars per infraction, it being understood that each day the infraction subsists is an independent violation. That last sentence is what turns a small problem into a big one: the clock runs while the work or the use is still there. To issue the tickets, the Board, the Permit Audit Officer, the government entities concerned and the municipalities may draw on their officials and employees, as well as on the Police Bureau or the municipal police forces.
Step 2: First the base: $500 or double the permit
The calculation starts from a base amount. To determine the fine, a minimum base amount of five hundred dollars is set, or the cost of the permit or alleged fault multiplied by two, whichever is greater. Where a permit is absent, the five-hundred-dollar minimum is used. And there is a clarification that heads off arguments: the permit’s cost is taken to be what the respondent would have had to pay had the normal process been followed. In other words, the saving from not seeking the permit does not reduce the fine: it defines it.
Step 3: Then severity: the multiplier table
The base is multiplied by the severity of the violation. The regulation’s table gives: absence of a permit, twice the fine’s base; expired permit, once the base; breach of the permit’s conditions, one and a half times the base; operating a use other than the one authorised or granted, twice the base; false information, one and a half times the base; breach of Planning Board orders, three times the base. For breach of a law or regulation the table gives no multiplier: a preliminary penalty of five hundred dollars is set for each violation. And for "other", one to three times the permit’s base. An important note about the source: in the published PDF, that table’s first column is cut off by the left margin, so the rows read truncated. The definitions that follow in the regulation itself allow six of the names to be reconstructed; the three-times-the-base row, the one about Board orders, does not appear among those definitions.
Step 4: What each fault means
The regulation defines the table’s faults. Absence of a permit: where one operates without the corresponding permit. Expired permit: an infraction for a permit expired by less than a year; if expired by more than a year, it is treated as absence of a permit — and there the multiplier jumps from one to two. Breach of the permit’s conditions: infringing the conditions, and the breach of each condition counts as an independent violation. Operating a use other than the one authorised or granted: where a use is being operated that is not the one described in the permit issued for the property. False information: where false information has been given during the administrative process, whether intentionally or through gross negligence. Breach of a law or regulation: any infraction of Ley 161-2009, the Joint Regulation, the Planning Regulations or any other applicable law that is not specified within a permit or final determination.
Step 5: Aggravating factors: twenty per cent, or fifty
Aggravating factors are deemed to exist where there is a risk of damage or negative impact to health, safety or property; damage or negative impact to health, safety or property; economic benefit; or recidivism. A determination that those factors exist carries an increase of twenty per cent of the fine’s total. And if the damage or impact to safety or property is greater and irreparable, the increase will be fifty per cent or up to a maximum of fifty thousand dollars, whichever is greater — all of it without prejudice to any civil or criminal action for faults or violations of other laws and regulations. In cases of recidivism or contumacy, an additional administrative fine of up to one hundred thousand dollars per violation may be imposed following the same parameters.
Step 6: The lien on your property
This is the consequence most people discover late: the fines constitute a real lien on the title of the property involved in the violation or violations. It is not a personal debt sitting in a file: it burdens the property. And the Board and the municipalities will take every step necessary to collect fines that have become final and firm, including going to the Court of First Instance, recording the fine in the Government of Puerto Rico’s register of issued fines and in SUI’s permanent register, and contracting collection services. Every debt and fine is recorded in that permanent register.
Step 7: What the ticket must say
If an administrative fault is determined to have occurred, the Permit Audit Officer, the government entities concerned and the autonomous municipalities with hierarchy I to III may issue administrative orders or fine tickets, containing at a minimum: the date and time of issue; the name of the official issuing the order or ticket; the place where the infraction took place; the administrative fault charged; the legal provision breached; the amount of the fine to be paid; and the signature of the issuing official. The forms may be electronic, and the official will include their full name and sign digitally or by hand. The copy is delivered in person, by certified mail or electronically to whoever is in charge of the property — owner, agent, employee, manager, assignee, tenant or successor — and will also contain the instructions for seeking reconsideration and review. If the person to notify is unknown, any alternative method authorised by the procedural and court rules is used.
Step 8: How it is paid
The regulation gives three routes. By credit card through the online payment system on SUI. In person at the Planning Board’s seat, which the regulation places at the Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Centre, Ave. De Diego, Stop 22, North Building, 14th Floor, San Juan. Or by certified mail with return receipt to: Junta de Planificación, Oficina de Presupuesto y Finanzas, P.O. Box 41119, San Juan PR 00940-1119. If paying by certified cheque or postal or bank money order, it must be made out to the Secretary of the Treasury with the ticket number noted on it. And if it is not paid, interest accrues on the amount imposed until it is satisfied, at the interest rate for civil judgments in force when the proceeding began.
Step 9: Reconsidering: you must deposit first
A party adversely affected by a fine issued by the Board, the Permit Audit Officer, the government entity concerned or the autonomous municipalities with hierarchy I to III may file an application for reconsideration or review, as Chapter 11.5 of the same volume provides. But there is a condition the regulation repeats twice and which in practice decides who challenges and who does not: if a fine has been issued, the party must deposit the full amount of the fine with the Board, in an account specially set up for such deposits. No reconsideration will be entertained without the proper deposit where a fine has been imposed. That is: deposit the total first, argue afterwards.
Where to do it
Payment goes through SUI’s online system by credit card; in person at the Planning Board’s seat at the Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Centre, Ave. De Diego, Stop 22, North Building, 14th Floor, San Juan; or by certified mail with return receipt to Junta de Planificación, Oficina de Presupuesto y Finanzas, P.O. Box 41119, San Juan PR 00940-1119. The deposit required before a reconsideration is made with the Board, in the account specially set up for it.
How long it takes
What to do if something goes wrong
If a ticket has arrived, the first thing is to read whether it carries the seven items the regulation requires — date and time, official’s name, place, fault charged, provision breached, amount and signature — plus the instructions for reconsideration. The second is to understand the calculation: a base of five hundred dollars or double the permit’s cost, whichever is greater, multiplied by the severity factor, plus twenty per cent if there are aggravating factors. The third is to act fast for one concrete reason: each day the infraction subsists counts as an independent violation, so legalising or stopping reduces what accrues. If the permit has been expired for less than a year, the multiplier is one; past a year, it is treated as absence of a permit and rises to two. If you are going to seek reconsideration, be ready to deposit the full fine first: without the deposit it is not entertained. And if you are going to sell the property, remember the fine is a real lien on the title. Three caveats: we leave the cost field unverified because this is a penalty schedule, not a fee for a service you request; the severity table is cut off by the left margin in the published PDF, so we reproduce the truncated rows and explain where the full names come from; and the file the Board links is named "Reglamento Conjunto de Emergencia", but the document inside is Joint Regulation No. 9473 of 16 June 2023.
Common mistakes
- Believing the fine is fixed: it is calculated from a base and a severity multiplier.
- Leaving the infraction standing, when each day it subsists counts as an independent violation.
- Letting a year pass on an expired permit, which turns the fault into absence of a permit.
- Seeking reconsideration without depositing the full fine with the Board.
- Thinking the fine is a personal debt and not a real lien on the property’s title.
- Making the cheque out to the Board instead of to the Secretary of the Treasury.
- Not noting the ticket number on the cheque or money order.
- Ignoring that interest runs until the fine is satisfied.
Frequently asked questions
How much is the fine for building without a permit?
Where a permit is absent, the base is five hundred dollars, and that fault’s severity multiplies the base by two. To that is added twenty per cent if there are aggravating factors, or fifty per cent — or up to fifty thousand dollars, whichever is greater — if the damage to safety or property is greater and irreparable. The ceiling is fifty thousand dollars per infraction, and each day the infraction subsists is an independent violation.
Can I challenge the fine?
Yes, by an application for reconsideration or review under Chapter 11.5 of the regulation. But first the full amount of the fine must be deposited with the Board, in the account specially set up for it: the regulation says no reconsideration will be entertained without the proper deposit.
Does the fine affect my property?
Yes. The regulation says the fines constitute a real lien on the title of the property involved in the violation or violations, and that every debt and fine is recorded in the permanent register forming part of SUI.
How do I pay?
By credit card through SUI’s online payment system; in person at the Board’s seat at the Roberto Sánchez Vilella Government Centre, Ave. De Diego, Stop 22, North Building, 14th Floor, San Juan; or by certified mail with return receipt to the Board’s Budget and Finance Office, P.O. Box 41119, San Juan PR 00940-1119. A certified cheque or money order is made out to the Secretary of the Treasury, with the ticket number noted.
Are people who halt authorised work fined?
The regulation says so expressly: the administrative fines also apply to anyone who obstructs, limits, halts or invades, without authority of law, an authorised construction activity or use, as Ley 161-2009 provides.
Official sources
These are the government pages this guide is based on.
- Junta de Planificación de Puerto Rico (JP)
Junta de Planificación
docs.pr.gov
- Puerto Rico Planning Board
jp
jp.pr.gov
Last verified
September 3, 2026
MiPRFácil is an independent informational website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Government of Puerto Rico or any government agency.
MiPRFácil does not submit applications on your behalf.
Was this guide helpful?
Did you find out-of-date information?
Complaint about unpermitted work or a business
Only someone with a proprietary interest or an abutter may file, and if the place cannot be found, it is filed away.
Reviewing a permit: twenty days and forty-eight hours
The term to challenge an OGPe determination is jurisdictional, and notifying the other parties is too.
Stopping work or revoking a permit: the 10% bond and what to allege
Act 82-2026 requires alleging imminent harm and a bond of no less than 10% of the project’s value in every paralization request, judicial or administrative.
The construction permit: what it asks for and why yours may not be “ministerial”
One permit covers urbanization, construction and demolition. If it is ministerial it moves fast; OGPe publishes exactly what disqualifies it.
What the Planning Board charges for each procedure
The fee schedule of Administrative Order JP-OA-2019-01: consultations, certifications, public hearings, copies and GIS data.